Share this

Dec 31, 2008

Are cross-strait shipping links domestic?

According to a Liberty Times article today, DPP legislators claim the cross straits shipping agreement paints the cross-strait shipments as domestic, not international, and that Taiwanese shippers are being denied permits by the Chinese authorities.

The government response is that as far as they know no Taiwanese shippers have applied yet, so nobody's been rejected and the allegations are empty; he asked the DPP to present evidence to the contrary.

Also see this post from Michael Turton.
Update in comments from Taiwan Echo:

More precise description of "no Taiwanese shippers have applied yet" is

"no Taiwanese shippers have submitted application to China yet"

which is not consistent with what I learned from the news -- that applications for entry were submitted to China but were denied.

Instead, Taiwanese ships were asked to get China's domestic permission.

Befre Chiang-Chen agreement effective on 12/15/08, Taiwanese ships didn't need to apply for China's domestic permission. Now they need to. That's how the agreement turns Taiwan into domestic part of China.

Non-punishment punishments

Diana Lee has left the KMT, though what this will mean practically is hard to say.

She'll likely retain her seat; pressure for an investigation will grow until prosecutors check out her citizenship status; she'll leave the office only if she's forced to, and the same goes for returning the years of salary she may well have illegally been collecting.

I can envision an inconclusive investigation and Diana rejoining the party before the next election.

Dec 29, 2008

KMT legislator Diana Lee: My US property proves nothing about my citizenship

Technically true, but hardly convincing.

Note: Taiwan Echo mentions in the comments that Diana is answering a non-issue:

DPP provides evidence that Diane Lee filed INCOME TAX this year, that's why she is illegible to receive the Economic Stimulus Payment (ESP).

Diane Lee replied with: "I filed for US PROPERTY TAX doesn't mean that I have US Citizenship."

huh ??

US IRS website clearly shows that only INCOME TAX counts for the ESP return.

KMT and the media

Must read from Claudia Jean's blog on the KMT's manipulation of all media, even Green-friendly media.

Dec 26, 2008

Ma Ying-jeou: Once the mainland lets us, we'll build the KMT again in China

Not that it would ever happen, but Jesus Christ ...

Note: I thought it seemed unlikely this comment slipped past me, and I'm increasingly thinking the whole article more or less a fabrication/major misunderstanding.

CCP peace agreement plans

I posted a little earlier this week on the KMT outline for reaching the peace agreement, but the CCP is of course thinking further ahead of that to unification.

Here's a fascinating, if late, catch of the CCP outline for progression of cross strait relations. The article is a summary of a bigger piece in the monthly China Review News (December edition not yet available online, but the article can be found here). The article was published by professor of international relations Huang Jiashu (黄嘉树), who works at Renmin University of China. Professor Huang professes to be revealing the CCP policy.

I posted this based on the summary, not the full article, and will try to do more on the full article later. The gist of the summary is thus:

Cross strait relations are currently at "low-level peace," which is to say there's no war.

The next step is to sign a peace agreement and thereby arrive at "mid-level peace," where war would be unthinkable and reconciliation would be the order of the day. China expects some regular mechanisms for military, party and leadership exchanges and cooperation (this is the most important step for the CCP; if the Taiwanese military works with the Chinese PLA instead of training to defend against it, weapons sales, defensive posturing, everything, could be drastically altered to the detriment of Taiwan's self-defensive capabilities).

And the third step would be "high-level peace," where economic and cultural relations would be fully normalized/systematized (presumably via common labor and goods markets) and the two sides could arrive at "unification on mutually agreed terms," (共议统一) which as far as I'm aware is the first time such "soft" language has been used in a publication like this, even in such an unofficial capacity.

The article notes that and as long as the forces of Taiwanese Independence "force" the Chinese to attack, the CCP will continue to work towards achieving peaceful unification and thereby "do everything in its power to prevent a cross-strait Chinese civil war."

================

... with this government, it just might work.

Dec 23, 2008

Cross-strait peace plan outline

As so kindly provided by the KMT's main think tank. Well, it's more of an argument for the necessity of a peace plan, and about the only outline in terms of a plan is Ma's "Three No's" policy (No Unification, No Independence, No war).

Chinese hackers take out DPP website


And replace it with a Chinese flag.

KMT: We'll end KMT-CCP forums after peace treaty

Which completely confirms Green complaints that the KMT is using party-to-party negotiations to create government policy which the KMT administration then unquestioningly adopts.

I think the peace treaty, which *would* be passed by the legislature, will establish conditions for peace that will include no Taiwanese independence. That would make the best DPP argument much harder to support (that Taiwan is already independent and that the only danger is eroding sovereignty and becoming a PRC province). It would politically kill the TI movement in the short term and who knows, it could even result in the criminalization of TI activities.

Judges in A-bian trial may be replaced

Probably due to completely unsubstantiated fears that two judges in A-bian's trial may be biased because he appointed them, the Taipei courts are considering changing the judges. The excuse being used is that the latest charges may be used in the original charges of misusing the state affairs fund, and the trials would be held together. Never mind how bad it looks.

Legislature completes check of lawmakers' US citizenship

And will hand the results out to each legislator as classified documents. Obviously, whether any legislators have broken the law on this front should not be made public. Sensitive information and all that.

Dec 22, 2008

Where we go from here

Do you remember the days when Taiwan's current VP was declaring Taiwan is an independent and sovereign country? Or when President Ma was saying that Taiwan was the same as the ROC? As long ago as that now seems, I do.

Those were the days just before the 2008 presidential election, when making such common sense statements was a necessary stretch for the KMT, meant to attract some more votes and dispel fears, all while more the party quietly held onto "one China (two interpretations)" and called for a One China market.

Now we are in different times, where Taiwan and China are "two regions" of the same country, and where Taiwan again takes the impossible position that the PRC does not exist, despite some rhetorical flair from our presidential office trying to spin things just a little more positively. The Third United Front, this time aimed at crushing formal Taiwanese Independence, is unfolding according to KMT-CCP plans.

What will ultimately happen? Who knows. Some things are certain: increased economic ties between Taiwan and China, as well as the precedents set by KMT-CCP dialogue that sidesteps the government, will increase Taiwan's economic dependence on China and may well alter the conditions under which election slogans and policies are developed. The DPP may be forced to alter its rhetorical approach while reinforcing its support of Taiwan's right to self-determination and holdin gout for the ultimate goal of establishing an internationally recognized country separate from the PRC.

Meanwhile, the KMT is unlikely to find a way to move beyond its current rhetorical emphasis on economics and pragmatism; how can they sell to the people any of the political concessions that the CCP will surely demand? If economics matters don't improve as the current leadership predicts, the KMT base and legislators will likely sour on the China-centric ideology and policy of the current administration. Internationally, we can expect Japanese and US support and interest in Taiwan to further decrease. The future does not exactly look bright, but this is not over.

It's the end game that matters. Unification is not just around the corner. The variables are too many. Despite the structural advantages the KMT enjoys at all election levels, and despite its media advantage (and pressure on public media), and despite the apparently politically motivated prosecution of DPP figures, the green camp is not crippled. Factionalism and debate is alive in well in both the KMT and the opposition. Green leaning papers and stations are financially healthy and functional, enjoying wide circulation and viewership. The public still has the right to initiate referenda and at the end of the day, Taiwan's future is still very much in the hands of the people, however the KMT tries to influence or control the likely direction Taiwan will go. And this power of referenda, however terribly flawed the current law is, is the most reassuring thing of all.

But aimless hope is not what we need. We need the DPP to develop an election plan that involves winning at all levels, not just the presidency. We need NGOs and the opposition to continue the fight against the rollback in human rights the KMT is initiating, and we need them to get some results, as difficult as that will be. We need a revised referendum law. We need targeted attacks on absurd KMT rhetoric and continued rejection of any "one China" framework. We need the green camp to develop a sales pitch that works and an alternative to KMT rule that is again attractive to the people.

DPP incompetence is potentially just as capable of damaging continued independence as a KMT sellout. We need measures to curb both of these dangers. Will we get them?

Of that, I am less hopeful.

What a depressing administration

::Sigh:: Between this bid to buy influence over Taiwan's biggest institutions and and the KMT's silence on CCP comments denouncing TI like this, I just don't know what to say. The battle is not over, of course, but it's going to be a much harder uphill struggle than I would have thought a year or two ago.

Roundup

A number of things worth rounding up from the last few days. It's been a busy month at work so I don't have time for too many comments, but check these out:

Sunday

The probe that warrants probing

Questions on why the police came to my home

Monday

COA criticized over response to H5N2

PRC touts US$19 billion financing for Taiwan firms (ruh roh!)

Ma repeats ‘region-to-region’ comment

ROC flag’s removal from NCKU forum sparks controversy

Dec 20, 2008

Five gov. officials at KMT-CCP conference in Shanghai

The Liberty Times believes it could be technically illegal, but even if it were there wouldn't be any action taken.

This is the problem with the KMT's strategy of doing everything with China no formally through regular channels, but semi-officially: nothing's official, unless it's unofficially official. Or officially unofficial.