This other article talks about elections within the party for provincial level party jobs, and their high satisfaction and participation rates.
You wouldn't think they would try to remind people democracy at this particular moment. My uneducated guess is this indicates the Party's increasing determination to appropriate the term democracy in order to "take" the term from potential reformists as the anniversary approaches, and probably for long term use. Controlling the language of the debate is important.
But further, it made me wonder: has Ma every said that by his definition, Chinese democracy would need to be a multi-party democracy? I don't think anyone's ever even thought to ask him that, because it normally goes without saying. But what if a future KMT administration's condition for unification talks, "democracy," could be met within a one party framework? I don't see that flying with the Taiwanese public, but you might expect some degree of push for the mainstreaming of that opinion within the next few years.
Well, its not exactly new for communist countries to use the term democracy.
ReplyDeleteA-gu
ReplyDeletewhen the China team for deaf ollies marched in close ceremony, they held a banner that read "Go GO Taiwan Compatriots in recovery from Typhoon" and this is like saying Taiwan is part of China, right in taipie, at the ollies, saying WE ARE ON COUNTRY, has anyone complained about this in public in the CHinese or English media? COMPATRIOTS? I know they use that word in China. but to use it here in Taiwan, on Taiwan soil, did anyone complain?>
The first commenter said it. 'Democratic centralism' has been in the communist playbook since Lenin's days.
ReplyDelete